The release of ChatGPT, the latest application of GPT3, has been dominating headlines and social media for the last few weeks. Especially for those in the creative industries, there is quite a bit of consternation surrounding ChatGPT's abilities and potential. Will it replace marketers? Content creators? Programmers? Artists? Is it truly the Death of the College Essay, as some headlines report?
Not exactly. And if you're unsure, you can just ask ChatGPT itself.
Which is what we did.
We wanted to get the information straight from the source, so we "interviewed" ChatGPT. Here's the unedited transcript, using the December 15th version of ChatGPT:
Q: What are the benefits of ChatGPT?
A: ChatGPT is a variant of the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) language model that has been fine-tuned for conversational language understanding. There are several benefits of using ChatGPT:
However, like any language model, GPT has some limitations. It may generate irrelevant or nonsensical responses if the input is not well-formed, or if it has not been fine-tuned for a specific task or domain.
Q: What are the limitations of ChatGPT?
A: ChatGPT, like any language model, has a few limitations. Some of the main limitations include:
Q: How was ChatGPT trained?
A: ChatGPT is a variant of the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) language model. Like other GPT models, it was trained using a technique called unsupervised learning.
In unsupervised learning, a model is trained on a large dataset of input text, without any labeled outputs. The goal of the training is to learn the underlying patterns and relationships in the input data.
To train ChatGPT, a dataset of conversational language was used. This dataset likely included transcripts of conversations, chat logs, and other forms of conversational text. The training process involved feeding this data into the model and adjusting the model's parameters to minimize the difference between the model's output and the input data.
The training process for ChatGPT used a transformer architecture, which is a type of neural network that is particularly well-suited for processing sequential data, like text. The transformer architecture allows the model to attend to different parts of the input data and generate more contextually relevant responses.
The training process also use pre-training method where the model was first trained on a large corpus of text and then fine-tuned on a smaller dataset specific to the conversational task. This fine-tuning process helps the model to generate more accurate and personalized responses.
The process of training GPT model on large amount of data is computationally expensive, which is why it is typically trained on powerful graphics processing units (GPUs) and it takes days or even weeks to train such large models. Additionally, the model can be continually updated with new data to improve its performance over time.
Keep in mind that GPT model like ChatGPT, was trained on a dataset that is reflective of the biases that exist in society, so it's important to be aware of these biases when using the model and make appropriate adjustments.
Q: Can ChatGPT be a substitute for human creativity? (This may be of particular interest to marketers.)
A: ChatGPT is a powerful language model that can generate coherent and fluent text, but it is not a substitute for human creativity.
While ChatGPT can generate a wide variety of text, including descriptions of objects, stories, and even poetry, it is limited by the patterns and relationships it has learned from the data it was trained on. This means that the model is not capable of truly "creating" something new in the way that a human might. Instead, it generates responses by recombining patterns and relationships it has seen in the training data.
Additionally, ChatGPT lacks the ability of human creativity, such as understanding the intent behind a message, empathy, and common-sense reasoning which are necessary to be truly creative.
While ChatGPT may be able to generate text that appears to be creative, it is important to remember that it is only a model, and that its output is not always going to be accurate or appropriate. In creative tasks, human oversight and validation is crucial, especially when the model is being used to generate content for public consumption, because it can perpetuate the biases present in its training data and even generate unsafe or harmful content.
ChatGPT can be a useful tool for tasks like generating text for a chatbot, virtual assistant or content generation, but it should not be used to replace human creativity. Instead, it can be used as a tool to augment human creativity and enhance the creative process.
Q: Can ChatGPT be persuasive?
A: ChatGPT, like any language model, can generate text that is coherent and fluent, but whether or not it can be persuasive depends on the context in which it is used.
Persuasion is the act of convincing someone to believe or do something. It involves appealing to the audience's emotions, values, and beliefs, and it can be achieved through a variety of different methods, such as logic, evidence, and storytelling.
ChatGPT has been trained on a large dataset of conversational language and can generate coherent, fluent and contextually relevant text but it lacks the ability of understanding the intent behind a message, empathy, and common-sense reasoning which are necessary to be truly persuasive.
Since the model generates text based on patterns it has seen in the training data, it may be able to generate text that appears to be persuasive, but it is ultimately limited by the data it was trained on and it may generate text that is not truly persuasive or even generate text that might be biased or offensive.
It's also important to note that GPT model is not specifically designed to be persuasive, the model is a general-purpose language model. However, if it is fine-tuned with a specific task in mind or in a specific domain with labeled data, it can be used to generate text that appears to be persuasive. But it still not capable of understanding the intent behind a message, empathy, and common-sense reasoning, this is where human oversight is important.
In summary, ChatGPT can generate text that appears to be persuasive, but it is not inherently persuasive and it can not understand the intent behind a message, empathy, and common-sense reasoning, it is a powerful tool that can generate coherent and contextually relevant text, but human oversight and validation is important when using it in any production system.
Q: Does ChatGPT have the potential to exacerbate the Dunning-Kruger effect?
A: The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people with low ability at a task overestimate their ability. It's named after a study that demonstrated that people who performed poorly on a test of logical reasoning, grammar, and humor were also the most likely to overestimate their test scores. This can happen because people who lack knowledge or skill in a certain area may not be able to accurately evaluate their own ability.
ChatGPT is a powerful language model that can generate fluent and coherent text, and it has the ability to respond to a wide range of topics. However, it does not have the ability to understand the intent behind a message, empathy, or common-sense reasoning. Because of this, people who use ChatGPT without understanding its limitations, may overestimate its capabilities and believe that its output is always accurate and appropriate.
In that sense, ChatGPT has the potential to exacerbate the Dunning-Kruger effect because it can provide convincing, but ultimately incorrect or biased, responses to certain questions. For example, if someone uses ChatGPT to generate text on a topic they are not familiar with, they may not be able to tell if the output is accurate or not, and they may incorrectly believe that they are an expert on the topic.
However, it's important to note that the Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias that people can have independent of any technology, and that ChatGPT as a tool, does not inherently make the bias worse. It's important to be aware of the limitations of ChatGPT and to have human oversight and validation when using it in any production system. Furthermore, it's also important to educate people about the capabilities and limitations of AI, to prevent people from overestimating their understanding or ability.
Q: What was the name of the rabid dog in "To Kill a Mockingbird"?
The name of the rabid dog in To Kill a Mockingbird is Tim Johnson. It's a minor but important character in the story, that causes quite a commotion in the town of Maycomb. The incident with the rabid dog is used to illustrate the racial prejudices of some of the characters in the novel, particularly the contrast between the compassion shown by the Finch family and the hate and fear shown by other citizens of the town.
Interestingly, we asked ChatGPT this same question on January 5th. Compare the above response to the response from a week ago:
In "To Kill a Mockingbird," the rabid dog is simply referred to as "the mad dog." It is not given a specific name. The mad dog is shot and killed by Atticus Finch, who is hailed as a hero for his bravery in taking down the dangerous animal. The incident serves as a metaphor for Atticus's willingness to do what is necessary, even if it is difficult or unpopular, in order to protect his community.
And this response, following the ChatGPT January 9 Version update:
In Harper Lee's novel "To Kill a Mockingbird," the name of the rabid dog is Tim Johnson. The dog character was used to explore themes of racism and prejudice in the story, as the dog's condition is portrayed as a metaphor for the moral decay of the town, and how the dog gets shoot by the townspeople, much like how Tom Robinson, the innocent man on trial for rape, gets falsely convicted and sentenced to death.
We left the transcript unedited for a couple of reasons. For one, some grammarians may have noticed that although ChatGPT itself says that it was trained to be grammatically correct, it doesn't always achieve that goal... including, ironically, its use of the phrase "grammatically correct response," which should have a hyphen. The AI is definitely not self-aware.
The second is that some of the information it provides is wrong, as shown in the conflicting outputs when asked about the dog in "To Kill a Mockingbird".
So, unless you already have specific knowledge in the domain about which you've asked ChatGPT to write, you'll still need to either gain that knowledge yourself, or find someone who already has that knowledge, to insure the accuracy of the information.
ChatGPT has the potential to streamline many writing tasks, but it will also very confidently provide wrong information.
Potential college essay plagiarists, beware...
Looking to add an AI component to your marketing stack? Schedule a demo today!